[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: saving sparc for etch requalification

On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 12:57:00PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> Other than problems with auric, the release team is concerned[1] about

Also, it seems they don't consider vore as enough to have buildd

04:47 < vorlon> neuro: using vore as one of two buildds leaves no margin for error anyway, there were times
                toward the end of sarge when it wasn't keeping up with load; so we'd need two other buildds
                besides vore to really qualify
04:48 < neuro> vorlon: "one buildd" is not a unit of measure.  One auric is enough to keep up by itself
04:48 < aj> mips: 10 users, mipsel: 50 users; d-i for both; upstream: yes for both; 1 buildd for both; "in
            progress" buildd redundancy; "ok" 24/7
04:48 < vorlon> neuro: and one vore is not; so auric+vore isn't N+1 redundancy
04:50 < vorlon> not as it was meant :)

  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno	            | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   aurel32@debian.org         | aurelien@aurel32.net
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net

Reply to: