Re: glibc 2.1 is now on master in my homedir
> If that's the case, I've already tested the 2.2.4 and 2.2.5 from the
> cvs, which means it's still broke :)
Sorry, I meant the broken vfork was added in 2.2.4 and was still broken
in 2.2.5. With the latest cvs tree, vfork seems to work for me.
> The reason I say to use the cvs is that it is always more up to date
> for sparc than the Linus kernel, even tho some parts of it (like added
> drivers) aren't as stable.
The differences should be manageable now that we have had the big sparc
merge of 2.2.4.
Anton
Reply to: