Re: What configuration prefix ?
Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> writes:
> > > I'm not fond of /opt in general, but I agree the alternatives are
> > > worse.
> >
> > Agreed. Another alternative would be to do something like /snap, but
> > that isn't provided for under the FHS/FSSTND.
>
> I'd much prefer /opt to that.
Same here.
> > > Perhaps snap-stable-gnome-hello? Or dsp-stable-gnome-hello if you
> > > prefer, but it's less immediately obvious. And /opt/snapshots-stable?
> >
> > That sounds good. How does /opt/snap-stable sound?
>
> Again, I would probably go for /opt/snapshots-stable...or maybe
> /opt/stable?
Ok. I can do that (/opt/snapshots-stable). I don't really care about
what it's called, but I've got to call it something. :-)
> > I think I'll use the snap-stable- prefix on the package names if
> > people don't mind.
>
> Sounds good.
Ok, I'll do that as well.
I don't think we need the prefix on the source package names. Or do
we? Maybe we do, because snap-stable-gnome-libs might be cut from a
differenct branch of the CVS than snap-devel-gnome-libs.
Cheers,
- Jim
Reply to: