Hi Mattia,
Quoting Mattia Rizzolo (2016-11-23 01:44:50)
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 07:14:22PM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> > Packages ucto and frog have been updated
> > accordingly to depend on it (no new upstream). The three packages are ready for upload now.
>
> starting with frog:
>
> * git repo is missing the tag for the last upload
Added
> * please revert eec388092aae834ed4dd6643b524861faca64356
> * and also 941f7477add917bc757d4123cba4336fe94b141e (unless it really
> does need a newer ucto dependency, does it really?! the generated
> binary dependency is not versioned (and how could it without proper
> symbol file...), so I very much doubt forcing a build order between
> ucto and frog means really something at the end (if it has issues
> building against a ucto built against a different version of libfolia
> than the one frog is currently building against, then it should fail
> the build; but this is actually a rarer issue that you might think).
Ok, so you're saying I don't need to force a higher libfolia version despite
the new so version? Will bug
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843053 still be fixed this
way?
> * the "[ Name Surname ]" thing in the changelog is only needed if
> different people made changes for that single upload; if you're alone
> you can remove it
Right, fixed
> * you have a bunch of trailing newlines in changelog
Fixed
> for ucto:
>
> well, not much to do considering I reviewed the last upload :P
> Just, don't bump the build-dep. If you have no changes to do in this
> package, what you want is a
> No-change upload to rebuild against libfolia5
> like we do in Ubuntu; or ask the release team to schedule a binNMU
> (which effectively achieves the very same, just bothering more people
> for nothing in this case, if you ask me..).
Ok, I reverted the changes, it's indeed a no-change upload then, no version
number change at all, is that valid? Let's indeed not bother people needlessly.
If so, frog and ucto should be in order now.
> I'm also waiting for the auto-transitioner to notice the libfolia upload
> and create a transition tracker to have more assurance those are the
> only 2 rdeps.
I'd be very surprised (and very pleasantly so) if a third party uses our
library AND packages his software for debian :) But I understand the precaution
yes.
Ciao,
--
Maarten van Gompel
Centre for Language Studies
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
proycon@anaproy.nl
http://proycon.anaproy.nl
http://github.com/proycon
GnuPG key: 0x1A31555C
XMPP: proycon@anaproy.nl Matrix: @proycon:anaproy.nl
Telegram: proycon IRC: proycon (freenode)
Twitter: https://twitter.com/proycon
Bitcoin: 1BRptZsKQtqRGSZ5qKbX2azbfiygHxJPsd
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature