On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 07:14:22PM +0100, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
> Packages ucto and frog have been updated
> accordingly to depend on it (no new upstream). The three packages are ready for upload now.
starting with frog:
* git repo is missing the tag for the last upload
* please revert eec388092aae834ed4dd6643b524861faca64356
* and also 941f7477add917bc757d4123cba4336fe94b141e (unless it really
does need a newer ucto dependency, does it really?! the generated
binary dependency is not versioned (and how could it without proper
symbol file...), so I very much doubt forcing a build order between
ucto and frog means really something at the end (if it has issues
building against a ucto built against a different version of libfolia
than the one frog is currently building against, then it should fail
the build; but this is actually a rarer issue that you might think).
* the "[ Name Surname ]" thing in the changelog is only needed if
different people made changes for that single upload; if you're alone
you can remove it
* you have a bunch of trailing newlines in changelog
for ucto:
well, not much to do considering I reviewed the last upload :P
Just, don't bump the build-dep. If you have no changes to do in this
package, what you want is a
No-change upload to rebuild against libfolia5
like we do in Ubuntu; or ask the release team to schedule a binNMU
(which effectively achieves the very same, just bothering more people
for nothing in this case, if you ask me..).
I'm also waiting for the auto-transitioner to notice the libfolia upload
and create a transition tracker to have more assurance those are the
only 2 rdeps.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature