[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Mathicgb

Hi Doug,

On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 08:14:56AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > email to the list about mathicgb.  It depends on mathic, which is
> > also currently waiting for a sponsor,
> 
> So feel free to add another line to SoB. :-)

This was quick. :-)
 
As you know we need to wait for libmemtailor-dev and thus as I said
please ping me about this.

BTW, I noticed that you did some patches to get gtest working which is
great.  I know that gtest is a bit tricky.  I also like that you
invented some autopkgtest.  I wonder whether you see any chance to run
the whole set of unittests also in autopkgtest (I have no idea how hard
this might be to approach).
 
Additional note:  In both packages (mathic and mathicgb) you needed to
create the tarball manually since upstream does not add release tags.
Did you contacted upstream about this and refer to

   https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide#Source_only_tarball

Please keep this mailing list in CC if you do so to enable further
comments of people reading this list.

Kind regards

       Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: