Re: Mathicgb
On 04/07/2015 01:55 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
As you know we need to wait for libmemtailor-dev and thus as I said
please ping me about this.
Will do.
BTW, I noticed that you did some patches to get gtest working which is
great. I know that gtest is a bit tricky. I also like that you
invented some autopkgtest. I wonder whether you see any chance to run
the whole set of unittests also in autopkgtest (I have no idea how hard
this might be to approach).
Yeah, I followed the advice in [1] and just chose a simple "smoke test"
as opposed to repeating the upstream tests.
Additional note: In both packages (mathic and mathicgb) you needed to
create the tarball manually since upstream does not add release tags.
Did you contacted upstream about this and refer to
https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide#Source_only_tarball
Done.
Please keep this mailing list in CC if you do so to enable further
comments of people reading this list.
D'oh -- I intended to but must not have. That's what I get for doing
things too late at night.
Thanks!
Doug
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2014/05/msg00004.html
Reply to: