[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Mathicgb




On 04/07/2015 01:55 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
As you know we need to wait for libmemtailor-dev and thus as I said
please ping me about this.

Will do.

BTW, I noticed that you did some patches to get gtest working which is
great.  I know that gtest is a bit tricky.  I also like that you
invented some autopkgtest.  I wonder whether you see any chance to run
the whole set of unittests also in autopkgtest (I have no idea how hard
this might be to approach).

Yeah, I followed the advice in [1] and just chose a simple "smoke test" as opposed to repeating the upstream tests.

Additional note:  In both packages (mathic and mathicgb) you needed to
create the tarball manually since upstream does not add release tags.
Did you contacted upstream about this and refer to

    https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide#Source_only_tarball

Done.

Please keep this mailing list in CC if you do so to enable further
comments of people reading this list.

D'oh -- I intended to but must not have. That's what I get for doing things too late at night.

Thanks!
Doug

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2014/05/msg00004.html


Reply to: