[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: BibTeX file from debian/upstream data (Was: New Debian Science metapackages)

On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 02:51:24PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 01:35:58PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > 1. Separate the "Please cite" from the (apparently?) first reference of
> > the References field in debian/upstream, and introduce a dedicated field
> > (Citation) for it, so that non-article citation are possible. If
> > Citation is not present, the current way should still work.
> What do you mean by non-article citation?  I'm not sure whether I
> understand your proposal?  Could you fake some simple example?
See mpqc and cp2k:


> > 3. Fix the displayed bibliographical data, some (the non-debian/upstream
> > ones?) packages no longer display volume and page numbers.
> I'm not very motivated to fix the old (not-working any more) mechanism
> to get "Published-In" working again.  It was invented to circumvent even
> more tags in the tasks files and was summarising some fields which are
> now specified in a more detailed way.  Re-enabling this old way would
> mean either way more complex script or template code.  I do not want to
> do this just to make something I want to go away working again.  It is
> way less work to convert those few publications to debian/upstream -
> even if I would need to do all this on my own.  I would (strongly)
> advise to rather use debian/upstream instead.

Fine, I'll look into it when I get around.


Reply to: