Re: BibTeX file from debian/upstream data (Was: New Debian Science metapackages)
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 02:51:24PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 01:35:58PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > 1. Separate the "Please cite" from the (apparently?) first reference of
> > the References field in debian/upstream, and introduce a dedicated field
> > (Citation) for it, so that non-article citation are possible. If
> > Citation is not present, the current way should still work.
> What do you mean by non-article citation? I'm not sure whether I
> understand your proposal? Could you fake some simple example?
See mpqc and cp2k:
> > 3. Fix the displayed bibliographical data, some (the non-debian/upstream
> > ones?) packages no longer display volume and page numbers.
> I'm not very motivated to fix the old (not-working any more) mechanism
> to get "Published-In" working again. It was invented to circumvent even
> more tags in the tasks files and was summarising some fields which are
> now specified in a more detailed way. Re-enabling this old way would
> mean either way more complex script or template code. I do not want to
> do this just to make something I want to go away working again. It is
> way less work to convert those few publications to debian/upstream -
> even if I would need to do all this on my own. I would (strongly)
> advise to rather use debian/upstream instead.
Fine, I'll look into it when I get around.