Re: BibTeX file from debian/upstream data (Was: New Debian Science metapackages)
- To: debian-science@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: BibTeX file from debian/upstream data (Was: New Debian Science metapackages)
- From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 13:28:13 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120502112813.GC14301@an3as.eu>
- In-reply-to: <20120425104736.GP10883@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org>
- References: <20120417112956.GC7283@an3as.eu> <20120418020319.GC9870@onerussian.com> <20120420074709.GA27854@lavezzi.sic.rm.cnr.it> <20120420163440.GB9870@onerussian.com> <20120421201934.GA28330@an3as.eu> <20120422005553.GA9870@onerussian.com> <20120424064412.GD23094@falafel.plessy.net> <20120424075133.GG21384@an3as.eu> <20120425104736.GP10883@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:47:36PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> ...
> So I think we should not scramble to normalize the data, but if we do,
> we should agree on some form.
As I expected the discussion you intended to trigger just did not
happen. I suggest I will just try to make suggestion based upon what I
regard usefull and you keep on observing and question what I'm doing.
I'm always open for any enhancement. I'm afraid otherwise we will keep
on sitting here without a citation solution for years. Is this OK?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: