Am Mittwoch, den 28.05.2008, 12:39 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Why not "... licensed under either GPL or BSD"? This makes sure that > it might fit any license in case there is some conflict. In my understanding the problem is not so much about conflicting license but about mixing compatible license with different definitions of "free". Having GPL patches in a BSD codebase may cause trouble in case of (i.e.) relicensing and should be avoided. The easiest solution seems to be to use upstream's license or a license that is even "more free". Best regards Manuel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil