Re: tasks overview wishlist: Canonical citing reference
Le Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 04:16:21PM +0200, Michael Banck a écrit :
> This is only the case if you add a XB-* field, which end up in the
> binary package. XS-* fields end up in the .dsc of the source package,
> and X-* field do not end up in either.
>
> If that might be too hard to parse for web-frontends or users, we could
> also just add it to the source package, that should not be an issue for
> bandwidth or CPU cycles. We could then ask packages.d.o or
> packages.qa.d.o to expose that info as well, maybe.
Le Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 02:20:08PM +0200, Michael Banck a écrit :
>
> Another matter are the article references explaining the package and/or
> giving more information; for those, bibtex entries probably make a lot
> of sense. On the other hand, we could just have it be a list of URLs,
> either to http://dx.doi.org/<DOI> or
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/<PMID> or similar. This would be a
> very compact form for a X-References in debian/control. If we settle on
> a debian/references (next to a debian/scitation), Quoting the title of
> the papers in ASCII transcription(?) (and possibly the author names),
> followed by the URL and maybe the bibtex data.
Hi again,
Thanks for the clarification!
so basically, to decide between parsing fields of the control file or
parsing a separate file, both probably being obtained from our VCS
repositories, and if we want the information to be presented to the user
on our websites, we need the input of those who would write the parsers
and follow their advice ?
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
Reply to: