debian-ruby Aug 2025 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

---

Antonio Terceiro

• Re: DEP-14 migration questions Aug 21
• Re: management of debian/salsa-ci.yml (Was: Why is the team standard to use two-file includes for Salsa CI?) Aug 15
• Re: finishing transition to Salsa Aug 14
• Re: removal of debian/.gitattributes? Aug 14

Daniel Leidert

• Re: ruby-jekill-*: switching from overlay mode to standard ruby team workflow? Aug 02
• Re: DEP-14 migration questions Aug 21

Leandro Cunha

• Re: RFS: ruby-dbf 4.3.2-2 Aug 22

Lucas Kanashiro

• Re: DEP-14 migration questions Aug 25
• Re: DEP-14 migration questions Aug 21

Lucas Nussbaum

• Re: management of debian/salsa-ci.yml (Was: Why is the team standard to use two-file includes for Salsa CI?) Aug 16
• Re: DEP-14 migration questions Aug 24
• Re: ruby-jekill-*: switching from overlay mode to standard ruby team workflow? Aug 09
• Re: DEP-14 migration questions Aug 26
• Re: management of debian/salsa-ci.yml (Was: Why is the team standard to use two-file includes for Salsa CI?) Aug 16
• finishing transition to Salsa Aug 09
• ruby-jekill-*: switching from overlay mode to standard ruby team workflow? Aug 02
• Re: management of debian/salsa-ci.yml (Was: Why is the team standard to use two-file includes for Salsa CI?) Aug 15
• Re: DEP-14 migration questions Aug 21
• Re: management of debian/salsa-ci.yml (Was: Why is the team standard to use two-file includes for Salsa CI?) Aug 21
• removal of debian/.gitattributes? Aug 14
• Re: finishing transition to Salsa Aug 15
• management of debian/salsa-ci.yml (Was: Why is the team standard to use two-file includes for Salsa CI?) Aug 15
• DEP-14 migration questions Aug 21
• Re: DEP-14 migration questions Aug 21
• Re: management of debian/salsa-ci.yml (Was: Why is the team standard to use two-file includes for Salsa CI?) Aug 21
• Re: DEP-14 migration questions Aug 25

Soren Stoutner

• Why is the team standard to use two-file includes for Salsa CI? Aug 14
• Re: management of debian/salsa-ci.yml (Was: Why is the team standard to use two-file includes for Salsa CI?) Aug 16
• Re: management of debian/salsa-ci.yml (Was: Why is the team standard to use two-file includes for Salsa CI?) Aug 15
• Re: management of debian/salsa-ci.yml (Was: Why is the team standard to use two-file includes for Salsa CI?) Aug 21
• Re: management of debian/salsa-ci.yml (Was: Why is the team standard to use two-file includes for Salsa CI?) Aug 21
• Is anyone working on the ruby-jquery-rails RC bug Aug 19
• Possible removal of ruby-actionpack-action-caching Aug 16
• Re: management of debian/salsa-ci.yml (Was: Why is the team standard to use two-file includes for Salsa CI?) Aug 16

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]