Hi, First, thanks for leading all the standardization across team packages! Appreciated :) On Thu, 2025-08-21 at 12:15 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > There was consensus during the DebConf BOF that we should migrate to > DEP-14. I plan to work on that. > > There's a few questions that we need to address: > > > 1/ name of the development branch (and default branch to be displayed > on salsa) > > We could either use debian/latest or debian/unstable. I propose that > we > use debian/latest, since for most packages, we don't maintain > concurrently versions in experimental and unstable. I like debian/latest, in the cases where we need to diverge from unstable in experimental, we can advise people to create a debian/experimental branch. The debian/experimental branch may be ahead of debian/latest for a specific time window, that's true, but I think the cases that we need to do this are rare (i.e. the interpreter during transitions). > > > 2/ content of gbp.conf > > We need to write a gbp.conf file for each package, with: > [DEFAULT] > debian-branch = debian/latest > upstream-branch = upstream/latest > pristine-tar = true +1. Cheers, Lucas Kanashiro.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part