On Sat, Aug 09, 2025 at 05:48:11PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > We had many packages that were not uploaded for a long time. They were > migrated to Salsa, but this did not reflect in the version currently in > unstable. > > Using UDD's Salsa dashboard[1] (which I improved while working on this), I > ensured that: > > 1/ All our packages in unstable have a Vcs field pointing to their > repository on Salsa. This mainly required doing an upload of the current > state of the Git repo of each package. I reviewed changes (the best I > could), but did not try to make any further improvement to the package, > so sometimes what I uploaded is already a bit behind in terms of > practices. > > 2/ All our packages use pristine-tar > > 3/ All our packages have Issues *disabled*, MRs enabled, Jobs enabled on > Salsa. > > 4/ All our packages have similar CI configuration (use > debian/salsa-ci.yml with the two includes) > > [1] https://udd.debian.org/salsa/?email1=pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers%40lists.alioth.debian.org&format=html&branches=on&gitlabci=on&gbpconf=on&pipeline=on#results Thanks!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature