On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 12:15:25PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > There was consensus during the DebConf BOF that we should migrate to > DEP-14. I plan to work on that. Thanks! > There's a few questions that we need to address: > > > 1/ name of the development branch (and default branch to be displayed on salsa) > > We could either use debian/latest or debian/unstable. I propose that we > use debian/latest, since for most packages, we don't maintain > concurrently versions in experimental and unstable. I don't care much. debian/latest seems good enough. > 2/ content of gbp.conf > > We need to write a gbp.conf file for each package, with: > [DEFAULT] > debian-branch = debian/latest > upstream-branch = upstream/latest > pristine-tar = true > > Are there other options that we would like to see applied to all > packages? > I'm pasting below the content of our gbp.conf files. I don't really > see anything that should be included by default. Please be aware of native packages. The ones I can think of at the moment are gem2deb, ruby-defaults and ruby-standalone. There might be others. ruby-defaults and ruby-standalone doen't even have a gbp.conf, gem2deb has a minimal one, just setting `debian-tag`.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature