On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:59:02PM +0100, Per Andersson wrote: > Hi! > > I would very much like to see gitlab in Debian. > > If you need help, sponsorship or want to co-maintain I would be happy to > help out! You have all been very supportive, thank you again :) > You can submit a regular RFS and Cc debian-ruby. Perfect, thank you. > As Antonio said, the changes should go upstream. > > If they cannot I suggest to patch the already existing Debian package > (or clean upstream to be packaged) so it supports whatever the fork > supports (if it is sane). > > If things get complicated, discuss here. :-) Fair enough. > I checked the Gemfile and made a very naive script to check if the > required packages are packaged or not. > > The quick glance reports about 66 packages, heads up for false positives > and negatives! > > Depending on if the developement group can be ommitted, it is eight > packages less to package. (The development group is nine packages but > I suggest sdoc is good to have in order to generate docs.) I am sorry to > say that I am not too sure about Gemfiles but I suppose that the > development, test group can be ommitted as well, that is another fifteen > packages less. > > That would total in about 40 primary dependencies not yet packaged. > > I have attached the script and it's output. Maybe someone more > knowledgable in Ruby and Gemfile land can take a peek at it? Thank you, it seems to run just fine! I believe we should only avoid :development, since the rest of the dependency groups will be needed. Hopefully most of these deps will be useful for other packages in the future. -- Daniel Martí - mvdan@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
Attachment:
pgp4VHe9jN8Vs.pgp
Description: PGP signature