Hi, On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 10:42:44AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
Hi Bo YU, On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 12:21:42PM +0800, Bo YU wrote:On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:00 AM Chris Lamb <chris@reproducible-builds.org> wrote: > I'm not involved in the day-to-day of maintaining the testing > framework so I'll have to leave a canonical reply to those who do. But > we are definitely interested in supporting more architectures in > theory, especially ones that a quite different to the ones we support > today.ACK, I think we would totally be interested in adding riscv!> In terms of the technical requirements, clearly we would need enough > RISC-V machines for use as builders and they would need to be fairly > powerful too. I'm not sure about numbers here, and whether virtual > machines could work; there are some variations we test for that might > need access to the bare metal... Ok, glad to know these facts. If there are any riscv hardware resources available here, I will update here and maybe need you or other r-b people to help setup it:)To give you you an idea of how much power we need, see here where there is a list of the current machines: https://jenkins.debian.net/userContent/thanks.html, with that much we are hanging on, and we don't really have much spare resources, so we'd need something on a similar scale.
Great! But I have to confirm again, if we build riscv64 Debian packages for t.r-b.o , we need similar scale VM(amd64) firstly? I mean, the real riscv64 hardware board is not considered here for the time being. The VM resources should be available there. Bo
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
-- Best Regards,
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature