On 29/11/10 16:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 17:22 +0300, Erinn Clark wrote: > >> * Dererk <dererk@debian.org> [2010:11:28 15:25 -0300]: >> >>> I'm on the way to find out if there's a simple way to backport the "fix" >>> (which I doubt it would be clean), but at this point I'm really >>> convinced that its a better idea to let the version at unstable >>> (0.2.10-3) to get into, since it's just one version away from TPU's >>> (0.2.9-1) and a version that is mostly based on fixing this problem (see >>> attached changelog), has been extensively tested for longer than 2 >>> months at unstable, with no mayor issues and none pending. >>> >> I too think that it would be better for Vidalia 0.2.10-3 to go into stable. >> Previous versions of Vidalia were using a geoip server which has now been taken >> offline (forever) and they will be missing functionality and trying to reach >> something that no longer exists. Please use the version in unstable. >> > This would be geoips.vidalia-project.net and the rewrites of > network/GeoIp*? > > Regards, > > Adam > Yes, the service that was provided by geoip.vidalia-project.net was re-written to be resolved locally though the Tor's provided GeoIP's DB (perfectly distributable by us, which was the very same reason to use an external service in the first place). Greetings, Dererk -- BOFH excuse #306: CPU-angle has to be adjusted because of vibrations coming from the nearby road
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature