[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Advance freeze exception request for libcgi-application-extra-plugin-bundle-perl

Please don't worry about 0.2+. I'll make sure that the bugs do not slip back in.

Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org> writes:

On 10/13/2010 11:41 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi, When 0.2 was built there was a hope of getting it into squeeze. I can understand if the boat was missed on that a long time

The issue with #593102 is that the usptream component has an odd layout and so needed to be repacked to build correctly.
Yeah. I do know that (I checked before answering). It will be the first
time Debian will release with l-a-e-p-b-perl. So, missing a module in
the first release can't considered a regression. That's why, *I* don't
consider it as RC. Other people might have a different opinion though.

If we produce a 0.1.1 that ONLY updates  the copyright for the icons
 and does the repacking for ProtectCSF could we get that into
squeeze? Of course such a 0.1.1 would not have updated standards
versions or updated copyright format etc.

As such simply downgrading #599794 to something less serious and waiting for the freeze to lift is attractive if that is an option.

No, that's still not an option. We could tag it squeeze-ignore if we
don't grant a freeze-exception for it, but the issue remains serious.


Well, if you add copyright etc in 0.1.1 then that will fix the
bug. Which means 0.1, 0.2, ... are buggy but 0.1.1 will be fixed. Thanks
to version tracking in the BTS there should be no confusion. The version
in squeeze/sid will be bug free but experimental will be buggy. A new
experimental upload of 0.3 would fix that seperately.


fn:Nicholas Bamber
org:Periapt Technologies

Reply to: