Re: quantlib 0.9.9 is nine days old but has not been built on any arch
On 20 December 2009 at 17:55, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Sorry for the delayed response.
|
| On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 07:17 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 15 December 2009 at 19:40, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
| > | libquantlib-0.9.7 has been removed from unstable. However,rquantlib is
| > | still not built on several architectures (it's waiting for r-base, which
| > | is waiting for fontconfig to be built / uploaded everywhere) and
| > | quantlib-swig again FTBFS with a compiler error when it was retried on
| > | amd64.
| >
| > For different packages, and on several occassions, I have had to resort to
| > removing -O2 / -O3 for certain arch/compiler combinations. Do you recommend
| > a new upload of quantlib-swig with special treatment for amd64 ?
|
| That would be one solution. As earlier versions of quantlib-swig have
| previously built successfully on amd64, it would be good to work with
| the porters and/or buildd-admins to try and resolve the ICE and have the
| package build without resorting to building an unoptimised package.
I had only lukewarm response from others on similar issues -- doko basically
recommends 'file upstream bugs' and from those I never heard back either.
Dirk
--
Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.
Reply to: