Re: Need rescheduled build of 'farma' on hppa (Was: forwarded message from Dirk Eddelbuettel)
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 11:25:23PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:55:43PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:31:20PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> >>>> * Dirk Eddelbuettel (edd@debian.org) [080602 22:24]:
> >>> Now, as this has been fixed via give-back, we still do NOT know why
> >>> Lamont sees the package as shipped whereas the other side does not.
> >>> Ideas, anyone?
> >> You might want to read before answering: the give-back happened after
> >> your first mail, *everyone* sees the package as installed since lamont's
> >> upload *after* the give-back was installed.
> >
> > There is no need for attitude, Luk. I am aware of the timeline. I
> > was just trying to give color to Andi.
>
> Andi was probably doing the give-back...
>
> > I as maintainer have been stuck with this package being lost between
> > the port and the archive for six weeks now.
> >
> > I could just be an pain in the arse, increment the debian revision and push a
> > rebuild -- but that's a technical non-solution to an issue that
> > _still_ nobody has addressed. Why did drop between the cracks?
>
> Something went wrong with the upload from the buildd to the archive, I
> wouldn't be surprised if that would be due to hardware problems at the time.
Right. And the fact that the build log shows the package as built, yet
shows its final status as failed, probably didn't help either.
> > Or -- is it fine to call it a Heisenbug, and in the future I just
> > torment you guys with rebuilds-across-all-arches at will? Just let me
> > know...
>
> As mentioned before, you should contact the buildd maintainer in such
> case: <arch>@buildd.debian.org
Ack -- will try to remember next time!
Thx, Dirk
--
Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.
Reply to: