Re: Need rescheduled build of 'farma' on hppa (Was: forwarded message from Dirk Eddelbuettel)
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:55:43PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:31:20PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>>>> * Dirk Eddelbuettel (edd@debian.org) [080602 22:24]:
>>> Now, as this has been fixed via give-back, we still do NOT know why
>>> Lamont sees the package as shipped whereas the other side does not.
>>> Ideas, anyone?
>> You might want to read before answering: the give-back happened after
>> your first mail, *everyone* sees the package as installed since lamont's
>> upload *after* the give-back was installed.
>
> There is no need for attitude, Luk. I am aware of the timeline. I
> was just trying to give color to Andi.
Andi was probably doing the give-back...
> I as maintainer have been stuck with this package being lost between
> the port and the archive for six weeks now.
>
> I could just be an pain in the arse, increment the debian revision and push a
> rebuild -- but that's a technical non-solution to an issue that
> _still_ nobody has addressed. Why did drop between the cracks?
Something went wrong with the upload from the buildd to the archive, I
wouldn't be surprised if that would be due to hardware problems at the time.
> Or -- is it fine to call it a Heisenbug, and in the future I just
> torment you guys with rebuilds-across-all-arches at will? Just let me
> know...
As mentioned before, you should contact the buildd maintainer in such
case: <arch>@buildd.debian.org
Cheers
Luk
Reply to: