Re: Need rescheduled build of 'farma' on hppa (Was: forwarded message from Dirk Eddelbuettel)
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:31:20PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Dirk Eddelbuettel (edd@debian.org) [080602 22:24]:
> > Thanks for the quick reply.
> >
> > On 2 June 2008 at 13:45, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > | On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 01:38:49PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > | Content-Description: message body text
> > | > Thanks for rebuilding farma aka r-cran-farma on hppa. It is holding up
> > | > transitions to testing.
> > |
> > | math/farma_260.72-3: Installed by buildd_hppa-penalosa [optional:out-of-date]
> > |
> > | It shows as installed here....
> >
> > Oh booy -- now we're going 360 degrees!
> >
> > So back to ftpmasters and release team to 'prove' that this has built.
> > Could someone PLEASE step up and make sure it actually reaches the archive?
> >
> > And we still don't know why the hppa build log lists this as failed.
>
> Can you please just wait for 12 hours?
>
> Package : farma
> Version : 260.72-3
> Builder : buildd_hppa-penalosa
> State : Installed
> Section : math
> Priority : optional
> Installed-Version : 260.72-3
> Previous-State : Uploaded
> State-Change : 2008 Jun 02 18:49:09
> Notes : out-of-date
>
> As you see, it is installed for not too long now, and the reason for it
> being installed now is that it has built since the given-back.
Thank. Just for the record, your (very helpful) give-back happened
after Thomas suggested that I talk to hppa@buildd whose mail I then
replied to.
So for once, let's just blame lack of CCs.
Now, as this has been fixed via give-back, we still do NOT know why
Lamont sees the package as shipped whereas the other side does not.
Ideas, anyone?
Dirk
--
Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.
Reply to: