[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Would an (l10n) NMU of atlas interfere with the gfortran trnasition?

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:30:36PM +0000, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:00:47PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:11:49PM +0000, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > > As soon as meep and mpb build on hppa/mips atlas3 is ripe for removal.
> > > So no NMU's neccesary. Same for lapack3 and refblas3.
> >   OTOH atlas suffers from #430227 too, so if it's scheduled for removal
> > at some point, it's better not to worry too much I'd say.
> It's atlas3, not atlas that's is going to be removed (as part of
> gfortran transition). But yes, please don't worry about it.

  OTOH the bug I pointed to is on atlas3 unless I'm mistaken :)

·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpkbxCptoXg7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: