On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:11:49PM +0000, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:23:34PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > I was working on a possible NMU of atlas3 to fix its longstanding > > debconf l10n issues. > > > Raphaël Laboissière then mentioned /me that atlas3 will probably > > disappear at some moment.... > > As soon as meep and mpb build on hppa/mips atlas3 is ripe for removal. > So no NMU's neccesary. Same for lapack3 and refblas3. > > > but, on the other hand, the "atlas" > > package could benefit from these debconf l10n improvements (strings > > are identical among packages) such as things he reported in #472366 > > > So, an l10n NMU of atlas would make sense. > > > However, I wouldn't like to interfere with the gfortran transition. > > It should not affect, atlas is in testing already. OTOH atlas suffers from #430227 too, so if it's scheduled for removal at some point, it's better not to worry too much I'd say. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpveMg_4sxw6.pgp
Description: PGP signature