[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Would an (l10n) NMU of atlas interfere with the gfortran trnasition?

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:11:49PM +0000, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:23:34PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > I was working on a possible NMU of atlas3 to fix its longstanding
> > debconf l10n issues.
> > Raphaël Laboissière then mentioned /me that atlas3 will probably
> > disappear at some moment....
> As soon as meep and mpb build on hppa/mips atlas3 is ripe for removal.
> So no NMU's neccesary. Same for lapack3 and refblas3.
> > but, on the other hand, the "atlas"
> > package could benefit from these debconf l10n improvements (strings
> > are identical among packages) such as things he reported in #472366
> > So, an l10n NMU of atlas would make sense.
> > However, I wouldn't like to interfere with the gfortran transition.
> It should not affect, atlas is in testing already.

  OTOH atlas suffers from #430227 too, so if it's scheduled for removal
at some point, it's better not to worry too much I'd say.

·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpVJrEMHvMiq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: