On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:23:34PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > I was working on a possible NMU of atlas3 to fix its longstanding > debconf l10n issues. > Raphaël Laboissière then mentioned /me that atlas3 will probably > disappear at some moment.... As soon as meep and mpb build on hppa/mips atlas3 is ripe for removal. So no NMU's neccesary. Same for lapack3 and refblas3. > but, on the other hand, the "atlas" > package could benefit from these debconf l10n improvements (strings > are identical among packages) such as things he reported in #472366 > So, an l10n NMU of atlas would make sense. > However, I wouldn't like to interfere with the gfortran transition. It should not affect, atlas is in testing already.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature