[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Would an (l10n) NMU of atlas interfere with the gfortran trnasition?

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:23:34PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I was working on a possible NMU of atlas3 to fix its longstanding
> debconf l10n issues.

> Raphaël Laboissière then mentioned /me that atlas3 will probably
> disappear at some moment....

As soon as meep and mpb build on hppa/mips atlas3 is ripe for removal.
So no NMU's neccesary. Same for lapack3 and refblas3.

> but, on the other hand, the "atlas"
> package could benefit from these debconf l10n improvements (strings
> are identical among packages) such as things he reported in #472366

> So, an l10n NMU of atlas would make sense.

> However, I wouldn't like to interfere with the gfortran transition.

It should not affect, atlas is in testing already.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: