Re: Should su-to-root be shipped in a separate package?

To: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
Cc: Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com>, debian-release@lists.debian.org, ballombe@debian.org
Subject: Re: Should su-to-root be shipped in a separate package?
From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:25:40 +0100
Message-id: <47BDDE44.9080202@debian.org>
Reply-to: daniel@debian.org
In-reply-to: <20080204045526.GA9383@scowler.net>
References: <20080202013535.GA4780@bluemoon> <200802031459.13420.atomo64@gmail.com> <878x21ivo4.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <200802031914.29408.atomo64@gmail.com> <87r6ftcxir.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <200802032022.57514.atomo64@gmail.com> <20080204045526.GA9383@scowler.net>

so.. what is the status of this? bill, do you intend to hand over
su-to-root to debianutils?

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

Reply to:

References:
- Re: New release goal: using su-to-root instead of *su in desktop/menu files
  - From: Armin Berres <trigger@space-based.de>
- Should su-to-root be shipped in a separate package?
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com>
- Re: Should su-to-root be shipped in a separate package?
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: Should su-to-root be shipped in a separate package?
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com>
- Re: Should su-to-root be shipped in a separate package?
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: Should su-to-root be shipped in a separate package?
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64@gmail.com>
- Re: Should su-to-root be shipped in a separate package?
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: binNMU requests for the OCaml 3.10.1 transition
Next by Date: Re: Give back lam on alpha
Previous by thread: Re: Should su-to-root be shipped in a separate package?
Next by thread: gnutls26
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread