[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Allow newer rggobi into etch?



Release team:

	I just uploaded rggobi into testing-proposed-updates 
	with the changelog entry below.  This should hopefully make
	it into etch.

Debian-admin:

	Thanks, I am done on pergolesi. Nice machine :)  Feel free to
	purge these:

	 r-base-dev ggobi debhelper cdbs libgtk2.0-dev libxml2-dev r-cran-rgtk2

	which Phil had installed earlier.

Ben:
	
	Big thanks for catching this, and suggesting the backport!!

Phil:

	Many thanks for the quick admin work.

Cheers,  Dirk


rggobi (2.1.4-2-1etch1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=medium

  * Backport of the change in 2.1.4-2-2 (of 28 Nov 2006) -- this change
    is minimal and affects only debian/rules where two 'overriding' variables
    need to be set so that the cdbs stanza /usr/share/R/debian/r-cran.mk
    can be used correctly on this package from the Omagehat (and not CRAN)
    upstream repository.  I also added one lintian cleanup (see below).

  * Thanks for Ben Burton for suggesting it, and for Steve Langasek to give
    it an initial thumbs-up.  This package should go into testing as the
    freeze caught the badly broken (i.e. empty) version 2.1.4-2-1.

  * debian/control: Remove Depends: entry as ggobi_2.1.4 has correct shlibs

  * The original changelog entry from 2.1.4-2.2 follows.

  * debian/rules: Also reset $debRlib for non-CRAN package (Closes: #400835)

 -- Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>  Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:52:42 -0600





On 13 February 2007 at 21:12, Philip Hands wrote:
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
| Hash: SHA1
| 
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Dear debian-admin team,
| > 
| > On 12 February 2007 at 14:59, Steve Langasek wrote:
| > | On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:58:46AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > | > Good point -- I only ever think of these as porting machines, but to
| > | > simply setup a 'backport' (or build of the now-fixed pkg in unstable)
| > | > I could do it on any box.
| > | 
| > | > Any empirical data on machines to try or not to try?
| > | 
| > | "The fast one"?  (whichever amd64 has testing chroots, which I think is
| > | pergolesi)
| > 
| > Please install the following build-deps for
| > 
| > 	r-omegahat-ggobi 
| > 
| > in 
| > 
| > 	pergolesi's testing chroot
| > 
| > The build-deps are 
| > 
| > 	Build-Depends: r-base-dev (>= 2.4.0), ggobi (>= 2.1.4), \
| > 		debhelper (>= .1.0), cdbs, libgtk2.0-dev, libxml2-dev, \
| > 		r-cran-rgtk2
| > 
| > so a cut&pasteable line would be 
| > 
| > 	apt-get install r-base-dev ggobi debhelper cdbs libgtk2.0-dev libxml2-dev r-cran-rgtk2
| 
| Done.
| 
| N.B.  That was done in the "testing" chroot on pergolesi, as requested, not
| the "amd64_etch" chroot -- if there's some reason why you needed it to be
| in the amd64 chroot, feel free to ask.
| 
| Cheers, Phil.
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
| Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
| Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
| 
| iD8DBQFF0imrYgOKS92bmRARAkkSAJ9tW/stbfO/jTOh22JEhsxuJ9/gAQCgrGN0
| XucDo8k+TX+J2FKwsR1FTas=
| =AHIu
| -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. 
                                                  -- Thomas A. Edison



Reply to: