Re: Allow newer rggobi into etch?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Dear debian-admin team,
>
> On 12 February 2007 at 14:59, Steve Langasek wrote:
> | On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:58:46AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > Good point -- I only ever think of these as porting machines, but to
> | > simply setup a 'backport' (or build of the now-fixed pkg in unstable)
> | > I could do it on any box.
> |
> | > Any empirical data on machines to try or not to try?
> |
> | "The fast one"? (whichever amd64 has testing chroots, which I think is
> | pergolesi)
>
> Please install the following build-deps for
>
> r-omegahat-ggobi
>
> in
>
> pergolesi's testing chroot
>
> The build-deps are
>
> Build-Depends: r-base-dev (>= 2.4.0), ggobi (>= 2.1.4), \
> debhelper (>= .1.0), cdbs, libgtk2.0-dev, libxml2-dev, \
> r-cran-rgtk2
>
> so a cut&pasteable line would be
>
> apt-get install r-base-dev ggobi debhelper cdbs libgtk2.0-dev libxml2-dev r-cran-rgtk2
Done.
N.B. That was done in the "testing" chroot on pergolesi, as requested, not
the "amd64_etch" chroot -- if there's some reason why you needed it to be
in the amd64 chroot, feel free to ask.
Cheers, Phil.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF0imrYgOKS92bmRARAkkSAJ9tW/stbfO/jTOh22JEhsxuJ9/gAQCgrGN0
XucDo8k+TX+J2FKwsR1FTas=
=AHIu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: