[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: lilypond plans

On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 05:38 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 07:05:01PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Currently lilypond 2.8.7 is in unstable.  It is blocked waiting for its
> > own timelimit and for guile-1.8 to finish building on other archs and
> > migrate itself.
> Well, it's waiting for more than just guile-1.8 to "finish building", there
> are guile-1.8 build failures on all the 64-bit architectures that need to be
> resolved before lilypond can be built against it, which means lilypond will
> be out-of-date on these archs until this bug in guile-1.8 is resolved.
> This seems to have been filed as bug #396119.

Yeah, but this is what confuses me.  Bug #396119 is not release
critical, because support for those archs is not RC, right?  So I'm
confused about why this should delay lilypond 2.8.7?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: