Re: lilypond plans
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 12:45:46PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 05:38 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 07:05:01PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > Currently lilypond 2.8.7 is in unstable. It is blocked waiting for its
> > > own timelimit and for guile-1.8 to finish building on other archs and
> > > migrate itself.
> > Well, it's waiting for more than just guile-1.8 to "finish building", there
> > are guile-1.8 build failures on all the 64-bit architectures that need to be
> > resolved before lilypond can be built against it, which means lilypond will
> > be out-of-date on these archs until this bug in guile-1.8 is resolved.
> > This seems to have been filed as bug #396119.
> Yeah, but this is what confuses me. Bug #396119 is not release
> critical, because support for those archs is not RC, right?
> So I'm confused about why this should delay lilypond 2.8.7?
Because lilypond 2.8.7 build-depends on guile-1.8, and lilypond *was*
previously built on these architectures where guile-1.8 is unavailable.
That still doesn't make 396119 release-critical. It does make it a bug that
has to be resolved for lilypond 2.8.7 to be released, AFAICS.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.