Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> writes:
>> Then m68k would be a suitable release candidate for etch+1.
>
> As usual you're avoiding the issue. The answer is not _that_ simple.
Really? What are the great mysterious complexities in it?
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2006.bluespice.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2006.bluespice.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>