[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?

On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 10:10:10AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > 	* have m68k be in unstable, and have it have its own "testing-like"
> >           suite of some description
> > 	    + keeps the arch alive
> > 	    - some work to keep m68k-testing in sync with real testing needed
> > 	    - doesn't have real releases
> > 	    - may not have security support
>  Is it possible to run britney multiple times, the first time for all
>  releasable arches, and the following runs for each other arch, but
>  commit changes to etch/$arch?
>  For example, this would permit releasing an etch/m68k without a
>  separate archive.
>  Perhaps the maintenance of the testing propagation of m68k alone should
>  then be made by m68k porters instead of the *release* team.

Finally a good proposal... thx! :)

Ciao...                //        Fon: 0381-2744150 
      Ingo           \X/         SIP: 2744150@sipgate.de

gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc

Reply to: