Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
>> Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> writes:
>>
>> > Well, that's what we want as well and if m68k could provide this, what's
>> > the reason this couldn't be released as "Debian"?
>>
>> So far, m68k *can't* provide it. That's the problem.
>
> Which we are trying to fix, so what if we _could_?
Then m68k would be a suitable release candidate for etch+1.
Thomas
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2006.bluespice.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2006.bluespice.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?
- From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>