Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?

[Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>]

Hi,

On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:

> Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >
> >> Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> >> 
> >> > Well, that's what we want as well and if m68k could provide this, what's 
> >> > the reason this couldn't be released as "Debian"?
> >> 
> >> So far, m68k *can't* provide it.  That's the problem.
> >
> > Which we are trying to fix, so what if we _could_?
> 
> Then m68k would be a suitable release candidate for etch+1.

As usual you're avoiding the issue. The answer is not _that_ simple.

bye, Roman

PS: 4 days and still no response to guile-1.6 patch...