debian-release Oct 2006 by date
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Oct 01
Oct 02
Oct 03
Oct 04
Oct 05
Oct 06
Oct 07
Oct 08
Oct 09
Oct 10
Oct 11
Oct 12
Oct 13
Oct 14
Oct 15
Oct 16
- Re: boost binaries are missing on powerpc, mips, mipsel and m68k (was Re: ICU transition status) Steve Langasek
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Final consensual proposal for the problematic firmware issue in the linux kernel sources. Manoj Srivastava
- Re: BinNMU request for scim-uim Steve Langasek
- Re: requesting binNMU/rebuild of asymptote 1.13-1 on arm (and m68k) Steve Langasek
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Final consensual proposal for the problematic firmware issue in the linux kernel sources. Sven Luther
- Re: BinNMU request for scim-uim Ming Hua
- Re: Bug#353865: Sarge to Etch upgrade with radeon Michel Dänzer
- RE: gaim 2 peter green
- Re: Bug#375077: udevd: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server -> boot fails Peter Eisentraut
- Re: BinNMU request for scim-uim Steve Langasek
- remove kernel-patch-lkcd Troy Heber
- D-I RC1 - release planning - soft freeze for changes in SVN Frans Pop
- D-I - Hint requests for RC1 Frans Pop
- Re: D-I - Hint requests for RC1 Frans Pop
- Re: D-I - Hint requests for RC1 Stephen Gran
- Re: D-I - Hint requests for RC1 Frans Pop
- Re: [ydirson@altern.org: Bug#387706 - splitting mesa and mesa-legacy for libosmesa] Yann Dirson
- Re: D-I - Hint requests for RC1 Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
- Re: Bug#363377: Raise severity Faidon Liambotis
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Please hint tetex-base into testing Frank Küster
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Kurt Roeckx
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: remove kernel-patch-lkcd Steve Langasek
- Re: D-I - Hint requests for RC1 Steve Langasek
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: Bug#363377: Raise severity Steve Langasek
- permission to upload mdadm 2.5.5 martin f krafft
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Bill Allombert
Oct 17
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Bill Allombert
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thiemo Seufer
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Bill Allombert
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Steve Langasek
- Re: D-I - Hint requests for RC1 Steve Langasek
- Re: D-I RC1 - release planning - soft freeze for changes in SVN Rick Thomas
- hppa libggi binNMU (was: Bug#390000: libggi-target-aa: empty package on hppa) Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
- Re: Bug#390000: libggi-target-aa: empty package on hppa Steve Langasek
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Anthony Towns
- please hint ltsp 0.99debian5 into etch Vagrant Cascadian
- Re: Please hint tetex-base into testing Steve Langasek
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Please hint tetex-base into testing Frank Küster
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Ingo Juergensmann
- Re: please hint ltsp 0.99debian5 into etch Steve Langasek
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Bill Allombert
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Ingo Juergensmann
- Re: D-I - Hint requests for RC1 Frans Pop
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Ingo Juergensmann
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Bill Allombert
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Ingo Juergensmann
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Aurélien GÉRÔME
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: D-I RC1 - release planning - soft freeze for changes in SVN Frans Pop
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Wouter Verhelst
- Re: D-I RC1 - release planning - soft freeze for changes in SVN Frans Pop
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Andreas Barth
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: D-I - Hint requests for RC1 Jeroen van Wolffelaar
- Re: Bug#392590: zeroconf: changes network settings without permission Christoph Martin
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Martin Michlmayr
- Re: Bug#392590: zeroconf: changes network settings without permission Mike Hommey
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: Bug#392590: zeroconf: changes network settings without permission Stephen Gran
- Re: Bug#392590: zeroconf: changes network settings without permission Mike Hommey
- Re: Bug#392590: zeroconf: changes network settings without permission Mike Hommey
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Filipus Klutiero
- Re: Bug#392590: zeroconf: changes network settings without permission Andrew Vaughan
- Re: Bug#392590: zeroconf: changes network settings without permission Mike Hommey
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Please bin-NMU mn-fit on alpha, amd64, ia64 Kevin B. McCarty
- Re: Bug#392590: zeroconf: changes network settings without permission Andrew Vaughan
- Re: Bug#392590: zeroconf: changes network settings without permission Mike Hommey
- Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ? Nathanael Nerode
- Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ? Sven Luther
- [D-I] Migrating partman Frans Pop
- [D-I] Migrating packages for the graphical installer Frans Pop
- Re: [D-I] Migrating packages for the graphical installer Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
- Re: [D-I] Migrating packages for the graphical installer Frans Pop
- Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ? Anthony Towns
- Re: Please bin-NMU mn-fit on alpha, amd64, ia64 Steve Langasek
- Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ? Don Armstrong
- Re: Request for binNMUs for pike7.6 transition Steve Langasek
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Anthony Towns
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Anthony Towns
Oct 18
- Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ? Roberto C. Sanchez
- Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ? Nathanael Nerode
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Anthony Towns
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Filipus Klutiero
- Re: [D-I] Migrating packages for the graphical installer Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Ingo Juergensmann
- Re: [D-I] Migrating packages for the graphical installer Loïc Minier
- Re: libgpod update Loïc Minier
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Frans Pop
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Loïc Minier
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Riccardo
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Ingo Juergensmann
- Re: [D-I] Migrating partman Jeroen van Wolffelaar
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Frans Pop
- Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ? Thomas Viehmann
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Anthony Towns
- Rebuilding all etch packages inside etch, round 2 Lucas Nussbaum
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Steve Langasek
- Re: Rebuilding all etch packages inside etch, round 2 Thijs Kinkhorst
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Ingo Juergensmann
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Ingo Juergensmann
- Re: Rebuilding all etch packages inside etch, round 2 Andreas Barth
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Raphael Hertzog
- Re: [D-I] Migrating packages for the graphical installer Frans Pop
- Re: Rebuilding all etch packages inside etch, round 2 Thijs Kinkhorst
- Re: Rebuilding all etch packages inside etch, round 2 Loïc Minier
- Re: Rebuilding all etch packages inside etch, round 2 Lucas Nussbaum
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Ingo Juergensmann
- Re: [D-I] Migrating packages for the graphical installer Frans Pop
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Michael Schmitz
- Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ? Stephen Gran
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Michael Schmitz
- Re: [D-I] Migrating packages for the graphical installer Jeroen van Wolffelaar
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Loïc Minier
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Frans Pop
- Why console-setup is not migrating to testing Frans Pop
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Riccardo
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Moritz Muehlenhoff
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Anthony Towns
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Anthony Towns
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Alexander Wirt
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Bill Allombert
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ? Francesco Poli
- Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ? Michael Poole
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
Oct 19
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Steve Langasek
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Loïc Minier
- Why was bug #387783 downgraded from serious to important? Markus Laire
- Re: Why was bug #387783 downgraded from serious to important? Andreas Barth
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Michael Schmitz
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Michael Schmitz
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Wouter Verhelst
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Wouter Verhelst
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Frans Pop
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Michael Schmitz
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Ingo Juergensmann
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Michael Schmitz
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Michael Schmitz
- belpic 2.5.9-5 Wouter Verhelst
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Michael Schmitz
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Aurelien Jarno
- Why was cjk-latex removed from testing? Frank Küster
- Re: Why was cjk-latex removed from testing? Andreas Barth
- Re: belpic 2.5.9-5 Steve Langasek
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Mark Duckworth
- Re: belpic 2.5.9-5 Wouter Verhelst
- Re: belpic 2.5.9-5 Steve Langasek
- binNMUs of gaim-plugins Joachim Breitner
Oct 20
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: binNMUs of gaim-plugins Steve Langasek
- Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ? Jeff Carr
- Request to remove ikvm from testing & etch Dave Beckett
- Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ? MJ Ray
- Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ? Arnoud Engelfriet
- Re: Why was cjk-latex removed from testing? danai . sae-han
- Re: Kernel Firmware issue: are GPLed sourceless firmwares legal to distribute ? Sven Luther
- Bug#394332: sysvinit: Please remove NEWS.Debian entries for 2.86.ds1-18 and -19 Kevin B. McCarty
- Re: Bug#394332: sysvinit: Please remove NEWS.Debian entries for 2.86.ds1-18 and -19 Kevin B. McCarty
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Anthony Towns
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Anthony Towns
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Anthony Towns
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Anthony Towns
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Final consensual proposal for the problematic firmware issue in the linux kernel sources. Peter Samuelson
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Bill Allombert
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Steve Langasek
- m68k release future Anthony Towns
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Steve Langasek
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Bill Allombert
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Release team position on the state of kernel firmware, post GR2006-007 Steve Langasek
- Re: binNMUs of gaim-plugins Ari Pollak
Oct 21
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Stephen R Marenka
- Re: m68k release future Stephen R Marenka
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Bill Allombert
- Re: Request to remove ikvm from testing & etch Steve Langasek
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: Release team position on the state of kernel firmware, post GR2006-007 Thomas Bushnell BSG
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Final consensual proposal for the problematic firmware issue in the linux kernel sources. Sven Luther
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: m68k is a release arch for etch Bill Allombert
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: Release team position on the state of kernel firmware, post GR2006-007 Sven Luther
- Re: Release team position on the state of kernel firmware, post GR2006-007 Sven Luther
- Re: status update: GNUstep library transition Steve Langasek
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: Request for binNMU of kdesvn Steve Langasek
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Bastian Blank
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- Re: m68k is a release arch for etch Ingo Juergensmann
- Remaining sysvinit issues and updating the etch version Petter Reinholdtsen
- Fixing double free bug in opencdk8/etch Andreas Metzler
- Python 2.4 with security fix in etch Ted Percival
- Re: [Pkg-kbd-devel] Why console-setup is not migrating to testing Anton Zinoviev
- Re: Fixing double free bug in opencdk8/etch Andreas Barth
- Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans? Roman Zippel
- python 2.4.4 for etch Matthias Klose
- Re: status update: GNUstep library transition Hubert Chan
Oct 22
Oct 23
Oct 24
The last update was on 16:14 GMT Wed May 01. There are 632 messages. Page 1 of 2.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc