[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libcwd/non-free

On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:01:08PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> I am not sure what the status is on non-free packages, but libcwd
> has really not been treated nicely:

>   220 days old (needed 10 days)

> I have requested it to be built several times and for architectures
> to be masked (or whatever that was called), but have been ignored
> apparently.

> Since non-free will also have a sarge component and 0.99.37 has many
> critical bugs that 0.99.39 fixes, I herewith request for libcwd to
> be hinted for inclusion, and if it's only i386. The library was
> designed for i386 only, but so far, I have not been able to get it
> to break on other architectures. Thus, the other architectures have
> been left in, but I would be satisfied if it at least came for i386.

> Thanks for your consideration.

Does this mean that the libcwd in testing is also non-free, and is in the
wrong section?

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: