Re: libcwd/non-free

[Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>]

Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:

> Does this mean that the libcwd in testing is also non-free, and is in
> the wrong section?

libcwd is licensed under the QPL, about which there was an extended
debian-legal thread a while back and non-free seemed to be the consensus
(he says warily, not particularly liking trying to summarize
debian-legal).

<http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=251983> is the relevant
bug.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>