El Martes, 15 de abril de 2014 08:17:55 Lucas Nussbaum escribió: > On 14/04/14 at 21:41 -0700, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Hi, > > > > [not subscribed, please retain CC] > > > > On Sun, Apr 13 2014, Paul Wise wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > >> Given how essential make is to our builds, it is perhaps > > >> > > >> wise to know how much work needs be done before we can upgrade make. > > >> How > > >> does one go about asking for an archive rebuild with the version of > > >> make in > > >> experimental (4.0) ? > > > > > > Sounds like a good idea to me. Some info about the archive rebuilds is > > > here: > > > > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2013/05/msg00034.html > > > https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/ArchiveTesting > > > > > So, I read those. They both seem to imply membership in the qa > > > > group, which I do not think I have. How do we move forward with this? > > Will a QA team member do the archive rebuild? Or would I be given > > (perhaps temporary) membership to move ahead with the rebuild? > > Hi Manoj, > > I was involved in archive rebuilds in the past, but David Suarez > (for the standard archive rebuilds and bug filing) and Sylvestre Ledru > (for the clang ones) have been doing alll the work. > > I'm Ccing them both, hoping they can help. > > Lucas Hi, Manoj, Im planning to do a GCC and a normal archive rebuild soon. Maybe I could mix your "make 4 rebuild" at the same time (normal+gcc+make4) or do it in another step, have to look at it... Maybe this weekend I take care of them. I'll ping back you when I have some results. Cheers, David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.