On 14/04/14 at 21:41 -0700, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > > [not subscribed, please retain CC] > On Sun, Apr 13 2014, Paul Wise wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > > >> Given how essential make is to our builds, it is perhaps > >> wise to know how much work needs be done before we can upgrade make. How > >> does one go about asking for an archive rebuild with the version of make in > >> experimental (4.0) ? > > > > Sounds like a good idea to me. Some info about the archive rebuilds is > > here: > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2013/05/msg00034.html > > https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/ArchiveTesting > > So, I read those. They both seem to imply membership in the qa > group, which I do not think I have. How do we move forward with this? > Will a QA team member do the archive rebuild? Or would I be given > (perhaps temporary) membership to move ahead with the rebuild? Hi Manoj, I was involved in archive rebuilds in the past, but David Suarez (for the standard archive rebuilds and bug filing) and Sylvestre Ledru (for the clang ones) have been doing alll the work. I'm Ccing them both, hoping they can help. Lucas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature