[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Handling of new bugs filed against inexistent packages



On Vi, 17 mai 13, 22:02:13, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
> 
> On Freitag, 17. Mai 2013, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Yeah, right... any pointers for the mass part? So far I've only picked
> > the low hanging fruit (not too many bugs and "packages" familiar to me).
> > Unfortunately as the "package" names become too diverse tools like bts
> > and querybts don't help much anymore :(
> 
> get rid off emacs21+/22 tomcat5.5 cupsys python2.3+2.4 and sunjava5 and new 
> patterns with bugs to process next will surely emerge!

I'm not worried about identifying the patterns, but on working with 
them. Unless I missed something neither querybts nor the web search 
support "Containing" for the package name (like it's possible for the 
subject).

I ended up parsing the output of 'w3m -dump', but I don't find this 
optimal.

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: