On Jo, 16 mai 13, 22:19:12, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > Given that I don't see much value in migrating them on the actual cups package > which is now two 1.x version ahead, I'm rather in favour of closing them with > a 1.4.4-1 version and a message saying "if you can reproduce this bug on > Wheezy, please reopen that bug and mark is as found in your version". I've just closed a first batch of cupsys bugs[1], namely those containing 'cupsys' in the subject. Before doing that I've reassigned two wishlist bugs that had patches attached, thinking that there might be something of value there. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint=;include=subject:cupsys The template message and list with bug numbers is attached. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
335483 441196 517747 235204 259059 260238 323806 329657 375309 401082 404763 405514 408106 461111 473981 239375 312011 319571 334794 427617 463752 187011 323901 373757 434277 261179 473198
Version: 1.4.4-1
Hello,
Some (long) time ago you filed this bug against cupsys or a related
package. In the meantime the cupsys package has been renamed to cups and
this bug was "lost". Since it is quite old now it is being closed.
If the issue you encountered is still present in recent cups packages
(as released with Debian 7.0 wheezy for example) the CUPS maintainers
would very much appreciate a fresh report using
reportbug <package>
(you should also mention the number of this bug if you think it contains
valuable information).
Please note that further information sent to this bug is likely to
remain unread, because the bug is currently not assigned to any existing
package.
Thank you for taking time to report bugs found in Debian packages.
Kind regards,
Andrei (with no relation to CUPS maintenance)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature