Re: Ranking of the worst maintainers

To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Ranking of the worst maintainers
From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 18:43:41 -0500
Message-id: <20041104234341.GZ20310@mathom.us>
Mail-followup-to: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411042145220.11792@wr-linux02>
References: <20041101191154.GA12990@zombie.inka.de> <20041102213725.GA23500@kitenet.net> <20041104094036.GA10596@uittosatama.fi> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411041146570.10096@wr-linux02> <418A866A.4060007@beamnet.de> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0411042145220.11792@wr-linux02>

On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 09:46:38PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:

Please explain your understanding of the relation of the words
  a) help - as I wrote    and
  b) insult - as you interpreted my mail


Have you checked the thread title lately?

Mike Stone

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Helping bussy maintainers (Re: Ranking of the worst maintainers)
  - From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>

References:
- Ranking of the worst maintainers
  - From: Eduard Bloch <blade@debian.org>
- Re: Ranking of the worst maintainers
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Ranking of the worst maintainers
  - From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
- Re: Ranking of the worst maintainers
  - From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
- Re: Ranking of the worst maintainers
  - From: Thomas Viehmann <tv@beamnet.de>
- Re: Ranking of the worst maintainers
  - From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>