Re: Orphaning of lockvc

To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Orphaning of lockvc
From: Matthew Vernon <matthew@sel.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 16:26:28 +0000 (GMT)
Message-id: <[🔎] 14901.52.205104.307182@rapun.sel.cam.ac.uk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20001209093537.C16774@seteuid.getuid.de>
References: <[🔎] 20001208214405.Q13673@seteuid.getuid.de> <[🔎] 14897.30757.820502.835898@rapun.sel.cam.ac.uk> <[🔎] 20001209093537.C16774@seteuid.getuid.de>

Christian Kurz writes:

 > [There's no need to Cc me, as I'm also on debian-qa, as you could assume
[noted]

 > No, Wichert doesn't want to maintain it and wanted it to orphan it and I
 > think no one needs to take a package over under some pressure. You
 > should always decide for you own, if you want to take a package over or
 > not.

Nah. NMUs for -qa suit me fine (and trn has more than enough
outstanding bugs I can't fix, thank you very much :)

Matthew

-- 
Rapun.sel - outermost outpost of the Pick Empire
http://www.pick.ucam.org

Reply to:

References:
- Orphaning of lockvc
  - From: Christian Kurz <shorty@debian.org>
- Orphaning of lockvc
  - From: Matthew Vernon <matthew@sel.cam.ac.uk>
- Re: Orphaning of lockvc
  - From: Christian Kurz <shorty@debian.org>

Prev by Date: jove Package - Maintainer does not respond.
Next by Date: Re: jove Package - Maintainer does not respond.
Previous by thread: Re: Orphaning of lockvc
Next by thread: Re: Orphaning of lockvc
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread