On 21/02/2013 11:58, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Thursday, February 21, 2013 11:12:58 AM Chow Loong Jin wrote: >> On 21/02/2013 01:59, Scott Kitterman wrote: >>> I've done the boring bits enough that my fingers mostly do them without >>> much attention from my brain. If I were going to abandon my current >>> approach, I'd have to see significant advantages for a new way and I >>> don't. >> >> Somehow I can only read this as: "I've done things manually all this while >> and it works for me, so go away and don't bother me because I don't see any >> advantages in having things automated." > > If the automation actually made things easier, I'd be in favor of it. I used > to manually tag uploads in svn for DPMT/PAPT because I didn't trust svn- > buildpackage. Then I learned it a bit better and started using it because it > was easier. Then I learned debcommit -r -R and it was even easier. > > I'm all for easy. I have yet to see a full source (regardless of VCS) or git > workflow that I didn't find more complex and harder to remember/do correctly > than what we have now. I really don't care about what the new hotness is. It > actually needs to be better and not just cooler. For me, a lot of better is > simpler. Update package: - edit - debcommit -a - git buildpackage (--git-builder="sbuild -d $distribution") Tagging: - git buildpackage --git-tag (or --git-tag-only if you've already built) Import new orig tarball: - git import-orig $tarball Cloning repository: - gbp-clone git://git.debian.org/….git Updating repository: - gbp-pull Looks simple enough to me. How much simpler do you want it? -- Kind regards, Loong Jin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature