On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 14:07 +0200, Siegfried Gevatter wrote:
> 2009/9/21 Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>:
> >> Maybe the applications
> >> using /usr/bin/env should get a bug filled, I agree with that.
> Can someone explain again what is it that we are gong to gain by
> patching like 50% of all applications?
First and foremost consistency among and predictable behaviour of *all*
Python application in Debian.
I can't say much to the specific merits of adopting '/usr/bin/python'
as default scheme, others may want to do, but the most important point
is that the "do what you see fit, but we prefer *bin/python" lead to a
wild hotchpotch of implemented schemes [1] (1-2 and 3-4) causing
different behaviour of Python applications in certain situations.
thanks for all the fish
Wolodja
[1] Schemes:
1. /usr/bin/python
2. /usr/bin/pythonX.Y (2.4 and 2.5 right now)
3. /usr/bin/env python
4. /usr/bin/env pythonX.Y
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature