Re: new dh_python proposal
- To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: new dh_python proposal
- From: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de>
- Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 23:11:50 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4AB69A96.2020004@bzed.de>
- In-reply-to: <20090804162551.GH19831@146653177.ece.utexas.edu>
- References: <20090802105300.GB2849@piotro.eu> <d34314100908040900v3dde361aq5a7e996f7be64499@mail.gmail.com> <20090804162551.GH19831@146653177.ece.utexas.edu>
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 12:00:09PM -0400, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> Now about the proposal (from newcomer's point of view):
>> dh_python is a shell script -- I have a strong belief that Python
>> package automation scripts should be written in Python, there is no
>> need to learn bashes when you program Python - do not expect that
>> package maintainers will be able to debug their scripts in shell
>> language.
> [skipping the rest of your mail]
>
> I got the impression that dh_python will be written in Piotr's
> favourite language, Python, but may need to be rewritten in Perl for
> inclusion in debhelper:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2009/08/msg00006.html
Time for a python binding to debhelper then? ;) But indeed the only proper way
to write a debhelper tool is in perl.
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
Reply to: