[Wolodja Wentland, 2009-09-20] > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 18:42 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > IMHO /usr/bin/python should be a rule and "/usr/bin/env python" - (very > > rare) exception (ipython or paster might qualify here) > > Could you elaborate on the reasons for that? I am really interested and > it is my impression that enforcing the "/usr/bin/env python" scheme > provides significant advantages over "/usr/bin/python". I tested my package(s) with specific interpreter, if administrator/user wants to use different one, he can run "his_own_python /usr/bin/application", I will not fix bugs reported by users/administrators who use custom interpreter. "/usr/bin/env python" might be a good solution for local scripts but not for system ones. -- Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature