[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed update to the python policy



On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 07:50:35PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 22 mars 2007 à 14:50 +0100, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> >   exactly, putting current is just yet-another-place where the
> > maintainers declares that he will only prepare the package for "current"
> > python. And you're right, python-(all-?)-dev is a already here to give a
> > hint to the dh_tool about your intention. Excellent point.
> 
> Just nitpicking: the dh_ tool doesn't need to know that, as it can guess
> it from what was previously built. This is a hint for the release
> managers (to know which packages need a binNMU), and could be the base
> for a script automating the build process.

  It's not necessarily true: when there is only one python supported,
you can't tell the difference between a package that only supports the
default python, or any of them :)

  And the maintainer can change his mind too, so looking in the past
packages looks brittle.


-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpdSfUvex2ML.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: