Hi! * Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org> [080409 00:11]: > > The current workflow in my head would be the following: > > - Someone sees something interesting and reports it to this list > > - It's picked up by an editor, and added to > > http://wiki.debian.org/ProjectNews/Issues/Current > You don't elaborate on this much, but I assume not everybody who can > edit the wiki is a DWN editor? Yes, I didn't define, who is an editor, since I don't think that's important; there no ACLs on the wiki page, so every one could edit the page, and that would make them an editor, wouldn't it? And so far I don't have a problem with that. > As you are posting to -news, some control on the content (and its > appropriateness on -news, as opposed to e.g. -devel-announce) would > be warranted, IMO. Surely. Since editing the wiki and posting to -news are not the same, there is (beside reviewing the wiki while the issues are written) a final step of QA. And be sure I won't post stuff to -news, I don't consider approriate ;) Yours sincerely, Alexander
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature